Perhaps it should be named “unconventional opinions that I still agree with”? Or perhaps “lol lets see what opinion they post now” (to be fair, the WHY ARE YOU BOOING ME? I’M RIGHT is sort of this)?
People are just upvoting and downvoting what they agree and disagree with, so it basically comes off as a trap to get things to laugh at - which it isn’t even good at. Should people not be voting on “yes, this is something that is genuinely unpopular”?
I see the down voting more often as a method of saying “this is a troll” or “this opinion is unpopular because it is evil/ makes no sense”. I’ve seen plenty of unpopular opinions that have decent ratios while genuinely being unpopular.
I think it’s similar to how the right wing views the first amendment in the US. You can say whatever you want that’s unpopular. Noone is stopping you. But that doesn’t mean that you’re entitled to upvotes for being a bigot or troll just because it technically fits the subject of the sub.
Similarly, I’ve read people encouraging voting as a way to say that the post benefits the conversation. Down vote trolls, posts without adequate backing of ideas or actual dangerous comments and upvote posts that contribute, even if you disagree, then disagree as a reply.
For example, in a post, “a hotdog is a sandwich”, upvote a comment that says, “meat & bread = sandwich” then reply, “you are an idiot” (then expect a downvote because your comment doesn’t contribute.
If you guys agree with both of these definitions, should you not ask or join a more apt community where it is in the rules instead of where the rules say otherwise? Seems easy to add on.