cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/53072462

Archived

[…]

The central risk is not a sudden systemic collapse, but a drawn‑out period of sub‑par growth, weak returns on investment, and fragile confidence—a pattern that will sound familiar to students of Japan’s post‑1990 trajectory.

Several specific challenges stand out:

  • Demographics: An aging, shrinking population caps housing demand and undermines the traditional link between urbanization and construction booms.
  • Balance sheets: Developers, local governments, and some financial institutions face long, grinding deleveraging cycles.
  • Policy trade‑offs: Stimulating housing too aggressively risks re‑inflating the bubble; tightening too hard risks tipping growth into a deeper downturn.
  • Confidence: Once households lose faith in property as a one‑way wealth escalator, rebuilding sentiment can take years.

[…]

  • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Same is true in China, they have laws lmao.

    I can’t lose my home for criticizing the government.

    Also you kinda can, eminent domain has famously been used against entire populations that a mayor, governor, or urban planner simply didn’t like.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        So what do you not actually care about whether property ownership is meaningfully different in China vs western countries beyond its use as hostile evidence?

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            I told you how things actually work, in both China and America, is anything that doesn’t reinforce preconceived notions bad faith to you?

            • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              You’re using the USA, a country just as shit if not worse than China when it comes to human rights to try and make China look good.

              That’s the bad faith argument.

              • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 days ago
                1. Property isn’t a human right.

                2. America is the easiest as I am most familiar with it since I lived there. There’s no European country I am aware of that doesn’t require you pay money to continue to own property, and have the ability to force you to sell at a price they pick, if they say they have a reason.

                Yes, you can argue against them in court, that’s true in China too, and there are rare cases where the state doesn’t have a legal mechanism to do so, and the highway or w/e has to be routed around the home, that’s true in China too.