I am all for supporting local artists and I feel that “handcrafted in XXX” products make great souvenirs when you’re connected to those places. Still, if some AI hallucinated me a perfect novel for my interests, or generated something I couldnt tell was manufactured or created by a master, I would happily enjoy it.

“How can I tell if this is slop so I can know to hate it” sounds stupid to me: good is good. When it comes to art / food / products, I want the best experience for ME. If I want human connectedness, then I’ll go interact with a human directly.

I can do without wasted water, power, and money, but in the abstract it seems to bother everyone on Lemmy to enjoy something a person didn’t make. I don’t have that hang-up.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you’re only enjoying art at a surface level, sure, I guess AI is fine. Oh that’s a nice picture of a cat. That’s a cool story about a wizard. This song is catchy.

    But for a lot of us, that’s only the beginning of our enjoyment of a work of art. The real magic comes from the connection to the artist. Every brush stroke, every word, every note is there because another human deliberately put it there. You’re experiencing their vision, you’re getting a tiny glimpse into their life. Did they do it that way because of something they themselves saw or heard in their own lives? Were they trained to do it that way by someone else? Did they purposely do it that way because it’s not how they were trained? And why did they choose to follow or not follow their training? Those people who trained them that way- where did they learn to do it? What inspired them to make this piece? What message are they sending to us through it, deliberately or not?

    And when you have an AI generating something, you loose all of that connection to the artist and to all the people and experiences in that artist’s life because there is no artist.

    I’m sure that someone out there is using AI to generate art, with very specific, thoughtful, detailed, and deliberate prompts that you can say the same thing about.

    But that’s not the vast majority of what’s out there is right now. It’s mostly just people who wanted there to be a thing and had the AI spit it out.

    And the medium is the message. You could create the most beautiful work of art that speaks to me on every level, that tells the most beautiful story in the world.

    And if you went out and shot an elephant to carve it into its tusk, I’d still hate it and I’d hate you for doing it. And the environment impact from AI tells me the same thing about you. You don’t care about the planet, about the environment, and your fellow man. Your art is not something that needs to exist and it should be repugnant to everyone who views it because of the way you created it.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m sure that someone out there is using AI to generate art, with very specific, thoughtful, detailed, and deliberate prompts that you can say the same thing about.

      Isn’t that the whole point? There are a ton more people making watercolor paintings than there are Monets and Rembrandts, but we don’t say that all their work is unenjoyable and just slop. Most work by most people is just not very good, and having more intention I don’t think raises its value. It’s another medium.