• mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Didn’t you have a problem with the term nato backed zionists? I already show you that military and defense cooperation with Israel happened under the umbrella of the NATO organization making nato the organization a backer of the zionist state of israel

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes I have issue with thr framing Industry standard presented, because it is disingenuous. They imply that nato is arming and equipping Israel. Which it is not. Saying shared training and exercises is “backing” is just as silly as people getting upset that China was doing military excericises with Russia. Also, putting the “entire” onus on nato is also just as ridiculous, as you were so kind to point out that support doesn’t just have to be weapons!

      So, many countries support the genocide. It’s not “nato” only, which is the russian bias industry standard is going for.

      Why not say UN supports the genocide? Nato countries are part of the UN, the un uses nato logistics and equipment. If you see why that is a spurious argument, then you know why it’s just as incorrect to say “nato”. Say something like “most western countries continue to support the ongoing, Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people”.

      • mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        They imply that nato is arming and equipping Israel

        Yes industry standard oppose NATO because of russia but didn’t mention the form of backing

        So, many countries support the genocide. It’s not “nato” only

        But this post is about nato and israel not russia . You are simply, doing whataboutism. Now if there is an article about china supporting Palestinians mentioning it’s good relation with Israel it is fair because it is iexposing hypocrisy rather than whataboutism

        Why not say UN supports the genocide?

        Because the Un is multiple entities with different functions none support Israel while nato is a military alliance . Where did the UN approve genocide and israeli military actions?

        Saying shared training and exercises is “backing” is just as silly as people getting upset that China was doing military excericises with Russia.

        No it is not silly

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are so so close. Genuinely close. It’s hard to see you circling around the answer here. Anyway, look. We both agree that Israel is committing genocide. Let’s leave it there, I wish you all the best. Have a great life.

          • mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Pure projection. It is you who circle around answers using whataboutism . You recognize the genocide yet you minimize nato roles despite all the evidences I provided

              • mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I will never stop mentionning how nato is backing israel no matter how much you deflect