• rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    4 days ago

    every company’s really out there deciding “I want to be a landlord instead of selling products to consumers” at the same time

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      More profitable, allows for far more control. When you’ve abandoned all morals and everything else for pure maximization of profit, it unfortunately makes a lot of sense.

    • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      They would rent food if they could. If you don’t pay your subscription, they’d dock your nutrients to the free tier so you’re less energetic and more likely to get sick.

      Even that might be too generous…why would there be a free tier?

      Fuckin capitalism man. As I saw Michael Burns talk about the other day, we need more chill.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    When you buy something, you absolutely do own it.

    Call this phenomenon where corporations try to pretend that it’s only “licensed” or that they somehow have the right to revoke it after the fact what it is: FRAUD and THEFT!

  • 🍉 DrRedOctopus 🐙🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    the closest thing to digital ownership of any product is through 🏴‍☠️ (plus a few drm free stores)

    any other platform just gives you a license that can be revoked at any time.

    • Peruvian_Skies@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Probably not, games aren’t like TV shows. You can just torrent them via Prowlarr if you want, no need for a whole dedicated service.