monica_b1998@lemmy.world to Science@mander.xyz · 3 days agoPrehistoric Humans May Have Interbred With Two Separate “Superarchaic” Specieswww.iflscience.comexternal-linkmessage-square24linkfedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down11
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkPrehistoric Humans May Have Interbred With Two Separate “Superarchaic” Specieswww.iflscience.commonica_b1998@lemmy.world to Science@mander.xyz · 3 days agomessage-square24linkfedilink
minus-squaregivesomefucks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·2 days ago Your position is that something can be two species at once? No, I’m saying two species can share a mutual subspecies… End points have differentiated enough to speciate, what’s in between is a “sub-species” of both I’m not sure if it makes more sense one way or the other, but obviously that’s a fundamental point you’d need to get before we move further. But you keep down voting and being weirdly argumentative about this. You do realize I gain absolutely nothing from helping you understand, right? If you act like this, most people are just going to stop trying to teach you stuff
minus-squareMandarbmax@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoSo what species is the sub species then under your framework?
No, I’m saying two species can share a mutual subspecies…
I’m not sure if it makes more sense one way or the other, but obviously that’s a fundamental point you’d need to get before we move further.
But you keep down voting and being weirdly argumentative about this.
You do realize I gain absolutely nothing from helping you understand, right?
If you act like this, most people are just going to stop trying to teach you stuff
So what species is the sub species then under your framework?