• halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are many regions where alternative forms of transport aren’t very viable. Nearly non-existent public transit and bike infrastructure because everything was designed from the beginning with cars in mind. Zoning requirements that mean everything is spread out and impossible to walk between. Possibly even combined with terrible weather for much of the year.

    Places where making changes to fix those issues, increase public options, etc. are met with stiff political backlash, not necessarily from the car people, but just simple conservatives or regressives that don’t think any money should be spent on that infrastructure, often simply because it’s not something they’d use.

    • pet1t@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      but, and I realise this might be a bit utopian, the more people (have to) use alternative modes of transportation, the more the need for better infrastructure will grow. domino effect and all that

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh definitely, but making those changes requires funding them. And that’s virtually impossible to get voters to approve in some places currently.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Much of Europe has the advantage here with simply existing before cars. Places that can’t fit car traffic, etc. so alternatives are either a requirement or already a higher priority than destroying existing infrastructure to make it fit.