• TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pretty much. Therapy is difficult to get and expensive. It’s historically been the privilege of the upper classes and it is very difficult to get for non-wealthy people.

    And people who have regular access to it use it as a class signifier to feel superior to people who don’t. Also often to the point where they demand everyone be in therapy, regardless of whether it’s needed or not. Which is again, a further signifies wealth and status. Like demanding other people have expensive hobbies or they are subhuman scum. Which is something I notice a lot among the ‘travel’ crowd.

    I think therapy should be treated like physical therapy. as it, prescribed when needed.

    The funny thing is when I meet/date working class people, they don’t think therapy is something everyone should have, but they acknowledge that mentally ill and distraught people should have access to it. But when I meet/date a upper class professional people, they think you are mentally ill by default if you aren’t actively in therapy forever. They also think anyone who doesn’t wear designer clothing is mentally ill as well.

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is it classist to say “see a doctor” about a more general medical problem?

    …because that’s the equivalent advice.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, when ‘seeing a doctor’ is a financially crippling and massively stress inducing thing to arrange, thing to do… yes.

      Yes, it is classist to flippantly suggest doing something that is very difficult for a lower class, less well off person to do.