Here some non-western source free from the empire
Looks inside
pro-Russia propaganda
Related post from YPTB: https://lemmy.ml/post/44625171
Also your posts from TASS and RT downvoted on ML as well.
Russian propaganda is when maybe the Uktaine war didn’t just start one day by itself for no reason
For example, it’s when they talk about how they’re “liberating” Ukrainian people. Here are some of the recent posts from the OP:
- Russian troops liberate Aleksandrovka community in Donetsk region over past day
- Russian troops liberate two communities in Ukraine operation over past day — top brass
- Russian army liberates settlement of Golubovka in DPR
Do they oppose the US? Sure. But are they freeing Ukrainian people? Hell no - they’ve been suffering for 4 years.
It’s like saying “America is just helping Iranian people to overthrow their government”. They don’t care about Iranian people at all.
They are freeing Russian-Ukrainians in Ukraine.
Those have been suffering for 12 years.Ukraine had a coup and the new leader decided to oppress the Russian-Ukrainians.
Zelensky presented himself as a peace candidate opposing the warmongering corrupt government,
but did the opposite once in power.Large parts of Russia have been given to Ukraine in the past during the Soviet times,
ironically to prevent invasion of both Russia and Ukraine from Western powers.
Russia wants those areas back and those areas want Russia back.
The Russian-Ukrainians in Donetsk and Lugansk Oblasts
tried doing an independence referendum before the war,
but were shot and killed at the polling station.
Have fun getting all your information from the modern equivalents to Goebbels
I don’t think sources like TASS are any different.
You say both are bad yet you default to only trust western sources
I’m not a westerner. But TASS and RT are like Fox News in the US. Those are simply bad sources.
Your comment reveals a lack of media literacy. There is a fundamental difference between Russian outlets like TASS and RT, which are state-controlled, and Fox News, which is corporate-owned. State media acts as the direct voice of the government, whereas corporate media answers to advertisers and owners. This makes the bias in state media far more explicit regarding national interests; their agenda is transparent. Conversely, Fox News still operates within a framework of journalistic standards and market competition. It contains valuable context depending on the situation, so dismissing it entirely is a mistake
I know this. I just don’t think state-controlled media is much different from corporate media under oligarchy. US don’t have state media (edit: state-owned, not just state-funded) as far as I know, but if they were, those media would simply change bias toward the ruling party.
I mentioned Fox News because they feel similar in spirit: conservative and usually not trustworthy.
State media is biased towards it’s ruling party/class and therefore not trustworthy. I’ll assume whatever media source that confirms my bias is trustworthy
Sounds like an echo chamber
Also
US don’t have state media
PBS, NPR, CSPAN, VoA, RadioFree, etc
Parenti and Chomsky to some degree argue that private corporate media is closely aligned to state interest, due to its intertwining with intelligence services
