MrNobody@quokk.au to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agovote peoplequokk.auexternal-linkmessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up1357arrow-down161
arrow-up1296arrow-down1external-linkvote peoplequokk.auMrNobody@quokk.au to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square102linkfedilink
minus-squareyoucantreadthis@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 month agoNo the primary is controlled it doesn’t actually have to obey its rules this most recent time they didn’t even hold one
minus-squarecouldhavebeenyou@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down5·1 month agoBar some very specific cases, they’re holding primaries for every electable house and senate seat that comes up every 2-4 years. Sure, party leadership tries to steer these (same as GOP) but if you want to break their balls: that’s where to do it
minus-squareWraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agono, they already argued that the primaries are a suggestion to get the feeling of the voters and are not binding.
No the primary is controlled it doesn’t actually have to obey its rules this most recent time they didn’t even hold one
Bar some very specific cases, they’re holding primaries for every electable house and senate seat that comes up every 2-4 years.
Sure, party leadership tries to steer these (same as GOP) but if you want to break their balls: that’s where to do it
no, they already argued that the primaries are a suggestion to get the feeling of the voters and are not binding.