gurty@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agoAnon enjoys videogame musici.imgur.comimagemessage-square101linkfedilinkarrow-up1766arrow-down17
arrow-up1759arrow-down1imageAnon enjoys videogame musici.imgur.comgurty@lemmy.world to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 2 days agomessage-square101linkfedilink
minus-squareLvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 days agoI’ve been using >code blocks for that, but I low key want actual greentext here.
minus-squarebdonvr@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 days agoJust use a backslash to escape the > > like this, which looks like: \> this
minus-squareLvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 days ago>greentext in plain colour It doesn’t feel as satisfying. But yes, it’s an option.
minus-squareLvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 days agoIt should, but I don’t expect either Lemmy or PieFed to implement it. Because, like, the original role of greentext was quoting, and we already have quote blocks.
I’ve been using
>code blocksfor that, but I low key want actual greentext here.Just use a backslash to escape the >
> like this, which looks like:
\> this
>greentext in plain colour
It doesn’t feel as satisfying. But yes, it’s an option.
I feel like it should be possible
It should, but I don’t expect either Lemmy or PieFed to implement it. Because, like, the original role of greentext was quoting, and we already have quote blocks.