DeylyHTFunTAHTu.png

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    our ancestors went and replaced wolves … bringing them back … not good for the wolves

    Umm yeah I’m going to stand firmly on the platform that wild populations that were devastated by human intervention benefit from the alleviation of that devastation.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “devastated by”?

      Please do give an example. Humans have been the apex predator around these parts for literally thousands of years. We manage the deer. We don’t devastate it. If you threw in a pack of wolves, never even mind about the social effects of throwing them into what is now a population center has, the wolves don’t have an understanding of how many deer are supposed to be killed and how many aren’t.

      I would love more wolves around my area, I’m not afraid of them at all. But it’s just not feasible anymore.

      Might be hard for you to understand but not all human actions destroy nature.