• Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    From my understanding, all the locals where this happened think this dude is a colossal dumbass.

    I think his legacy is slowly changing though, and people are less impressed by his antics today than when it happened.

    • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      He wasn’t a dumbass, he was just suicidal.
      He first left his privileged life, then his family and friends, then society. Typical steps of a suicidal person preparing for the end.
      If he actually wanted to keep living, he could have left the bus and simply walked back, 3 days before his provisions ran out (it takes 6 hours to get to the trailhead).
      But he stayed, even though he didn’t have the skills to live off the land. He accepted death, until it came close, then he regretted his decision and tried to get out but it was too late.

      • themaninblack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        To me, this is the simplest and most plausible explanation.

        Somewhat related but it’s odd to me how many people I’ve met that feel so strongly negatively about him. Maybe as a herd instinct to warn others?

        He wasn’t exceptionally selfish as he had no serious responsibilities.

        • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          On June 18, 2020, various government agencies coordinated with an Alaska Army National Guard training mission to remove the bus, deemed a public safety issue after at least 15 people had to be rescued and at least two people died while attempting to cross the Teklanika River to reach the bus.[

          This BS is part of the reason, I think. Not only is he a dumbass, but he inspires other dumbasses to be the best dumbass they can.

        • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The reason was him refusing to bring a map, which would have shown a bridge over the river less than a mile away.
          And not scouting out his environment either, or even trying a detour along the river, or improvising a raft…

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            i’m too lazy to look into, but did he actually starve starve to death or was there some medical complication? it takes a long time to starve to death

            • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              His emaciated decomposing body was found by hunters. Time of death couldn’t be determined accurately.
              The last 4 entries in his diary were just a date and a dash (-).
              He had a bag of plant seeds with him that contained a toxin which causes paralysis.
              His diary contained entries documenting his dwindling food reserves and unsuccessful hunting attempts.

  • Snowcano@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I remember watching the movie and then immediately thinking, “Why the fuck did I just watch that? And why the fuck did anyone make it? This is not a story that needs to be given attention.”

    • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Idk, I always thought of it as a modern take on Walden . A cautionary tale for those folks who get really hyped up about a life in the bush who forget the crucial fact that Thoreau was on a friend’s property and got more meaningful support from people than the book really lets on.

      One of those “Yes, lots of people feel like you do, AP English guy, but don’t think you’ll make it on vibes alone and not die like a dumbass” kind of things. Appreciated it differently at 16 and 20.

      • FrChazzz@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was kinda like this, adoring fetishizing a life free from material constraints, wearing busted old shoes, etc. Then I worked at a homeless church and that’s when I realized two things: first, I was basically cosplaying as poor; second, every homeless person I talked to basically thought it was stupid to not have things when you otherwise could have them.

        The clearest was this one time I grabbed a cup of coffee and sat at one of the breakfast tables with guys. They looked at me like “you’re not eating?” And I said that I wasn’t hungry and that I didn’t want to take a plate away from someone who might’ve needed it. They chastised me heavily. “You could have got your plate and then shared it with all of us, then!” I realized that I had the luxury to turn down food. They saw my torn up shoes as a kind of affectation (which they were, but I couldn’t admit it at the time).

        It’s turned me off of a fair bit of folk music, tbh. This whole “get rid of your stuff and be free” sentiment. Yes, reject capitalistic materialism. But the discipline is in having enough. The person with nothing can be just as obsessed with wealth as the person who hoards it.