• tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    My ex was one of those. Believe me, it’s not all it’s cracked up to be. But the sex was great!

    Edit: Whoops looks like my joke offended a few of you. I guess it was the one user who took the time to look up one comment I made weeks ago that really shows how obsessed some can get. Creepy. Enjoy reading my history and try not to keep me in your thoughts for too long.

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s not what was presented to the Supreme Court. This wasn’t a ban on kids being transgender or having anything medically done outside of their household. It’s about hiding it from their parents. And the people crying foul about bad parents out there should probably take another look at eugenics then if they don’t like what some parents are doing.

      Idk man, it sounds like you probably weren’t their type.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        pulls up one comment from a users history

        Obsess much? Am I on your mind that badly? Please let me know how I hurt your feelings.

        • webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          It took maybe a minute to find a comment, but okay. But it does seem like she would not have been interested in you if she knew you better before that.

          Would it help if I gave you relationship advice?

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think the fact that it’s the very first thing she said that’s is the issue. People who are constantly “on” are not fun to be around long term.

        • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not the first thing she says, it’s the only thing. It’s a two panel comic not a novel, the format forces brevity.

      • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s okay if you’ve never been in a relationship. Maybe one day when you grow up you might feel something physical instead of just your hand and an AI GFE.

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Bro, you should have clarified instead of attacking.

          I took your statement to mean that your ex was one of those people where everything they say is centered around some cause, which can definitely be exhausting.

          People took it to mean that you were annoyed that your ex supported things like the humane treatment of immigrants.

          • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            6 days ago

            It’s literally right there in OPs comic. LmAO wow people really were quick to center it on their political beliefs. Good for them, just lets others know how easily triggered they are.

            I’ll probably be banned by that users 30 communities they mod because I cracked a joke right back at them.

            • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              I really would like to know what it feels like to perpetually be the victim of every human interaction you experience. How exhausting is it? Do you have like a rolodex of excuses to bring up?

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t see how she’s crazy. She’s right. How are you going to accept a giant copper statue, place it at what was considered at the time to be the entrance to our country, which all immagrants would see, and then put a plaque on it that says:

        “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

        How are you going to do all that, then kill the inhabitants of this land, and then call Mexicans (which owned like 1/3rd of the land now called America) illegal?

          • Art3mis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            I cant speak for what they are saying but thats what im saying. Borders only exist to prop up the owning class and pit the working classes against eachother.

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Sure, but borderless doesn’t mean lawless. I’m a world with no borders you’d have no immigration. But you’d still have laws applied when people are born, which is effectively the same thing. Giving them an ID. Making sure they’re getting their education and vaccines. Etc.

              And if you somehow avoided doing those things, that’s breaking the law and you’d be illegally outside the system.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            “So you’re saying that the people who stole the land and murdered the inhabitants can’t tell other people they can’t come onto stolen land??”

            Rephrased to be more accurate

            • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Yeah. I don’t agree with that. I think it’s quite reasonable that the country that now exists can have laws governing intake of people.

              What other options are there?

              I get the vibe. But give me one reasonable alternative.

              Edit: I see nine down votes, one insult, and one option that only is reasonable if the resulting country would rely on the US for defense. Which is to say, there’s no reasonable option behind this cool catch phrase. It’s just a cool catch phrase. And I get down voting because I’m insulting. Your cool catchphrase. But we’re not going to get anywhere if we’re working off vibes.

                • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I could see this working in a world where people were sensible. I’d certainly support giving back some portion of the country and saying “ok you’re your own country now, have at it”.

                  Where people will fight to the death is: which parts and how much land.

                  But this at least is could be the framework for a reasonable option.

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                You act like the people that were here before didn’t have laws or society or ways of dealing with outsiders, and that’s pretty fucking gross of you

                • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Nope. That’s actually my point. Can’t have a society without rules for entry.

                  So “no one is illegal on stolen land” is saying “you stole the land and built a society, and that society can’t have the rules necessary to exist.”

                  It poses no next step and no real solution to the problem. It feels nice and gets us nowhere.

                  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    Mkay, then your point is based solely on xenophobia and incorrect assumptions. I hope you take a moment to reflect on that, and try and come up with something better.

          • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Better countries have proven they do not need to be the way they are. The EU Shengen area let the policies of the era of empires and kingdoms fall away while preseving a countries identity. The current US system can be described as “cruel by design” and needs to be removed and its facilitators barred from civil service.