A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 days agoThe paradox of electoralismlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1241arrow-down124
arrow-up1217arrow-down1imageThe paradox of electoralismlemmy.dbzer0.comA404@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 days agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squaredansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 days agoBecause a large part of many of these practices is the exclusion of all others. Thanks for sharing, though!
minus-squaredansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 days agoThey do not want to coexist. The existence of an ‘other’ is a threat/attack to them. Read nazi philosopher carl schmitt or fiction novel ‘blindsight’.
minus-squarehoohoohoot@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoIf we could come up with an agreement of like maximum land size per person and minimum distance between the next such clan, maybe it could function? But then again nobody would be in the fashist clan, and they would not like this idea haha What else do you propose?
minus-squaredansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 days agoNoted elsewhere. Differences will happen. Why make them discrete or sacred?
minus-squarehoohoohoot@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoHow do we achieve anarchist land and life, with preferably 0 bloodshed or prison time?
minus-squaredansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 days agoI expect the same way you continue as is without any prison or bloodshed.
minus-squarehoohoohoot@fedinsfw.applinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoIt is not. I am already forced into slavery via work, taxes, and the entire school-school-work-work-work-die way of EXISTING, not living. So by doing nothing I am already shoved into a live-like-this box. Trying to get out of that box would not go well for anyone. Trying to live outside the box would break oh so many laws, rules, from a world I and many do not want to be apart of. IS THIS CLEAR ENOUGH? Lol
minus-squaredansemacabreingalone@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoA world that thrives on slavery and incarceration, a violent fantasy nightmare floating on an ocean of exploitation and innocent blood, refreshed always faster than it evaporates. Yes.
Because a large part of many of these practices is the exclusion of all others. Thanks for sharing, though!
What you mean?
They do not want to coexist. The existence of an ‘other’ is a threat/attack to them.
Read nazi philosopher carl schmitt or fiction novel ‘blindsight’.
If we could come up with an agreement of like maximum land size per person and minimum distance between the next such clan, maybe it could function?
But then again nobody would be in the fashist clan, and they would not like this idea haha
What else do you propose?
Noted elsewhere. Differences will happen. Why make them discrete or sacred?
How do we achieve anarchist land and life, with preferably 0 bloodshed or prison time?
I expect the same way you continue as is without any prison or bloodshed.
It is not.
I am already forced into slavery via work, taxes, and the entire school-school-work-work-work-die way of EXISTING, not living.
So by doing nothing I am already shoved into a live-like-this box.
Trying to get out of that box would not go well for anyone.
Trying to live outside the box would break oh so many laws, rules, from a world I and many do not want to be apart of.
IS THIS CLEAR ENOUGH? Lol
A world that thrives on slavery and incarceration, a violent fantasy nightmare floating on an ocean of exploitation and innocent blood, refreshed always faster than it evaporates. Yes.