• RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Cars are much more advanced tech than bikes. Hell we have partly self driving electric cars now. That’s some sci-fi shit

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s why I can’t understand how some bikes can cost as much as a small used car.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          And some watches cost far more than both.

          Price isn’t always perfectly aligned with complexity or utility 🤷‍♀️

          • Damage@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah, some watches, but you can buy perfectly competent watches for very low prices.

            You can’t buy a perfectly competent electric bike for a low price, at least not where I am.

      • fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Can this argument just disappear from discourse? People don’t always drive around with their partner, dog and 2.5 kids AND groceries AND spare tires AND grandparents.

        The majority of people in car-centric areas use their car only to haul around themselves, which could be done with public transport or bikes.

        • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          That, and the nearest grocery store being 15 miles (25 km) away is highly unusual even by US standards. In the US alone, over 80% of people live in what the Census Bureau calls a city, defined as “encompass[ing] at least 2,000 housing units or hav[ing] a population of at least 5,000 people.” The fact that someone chooses to live in bumfuck nowhere shouldn’t mean that the other people who live in a town with population > 5 shouldn’t get to have safe, affordable, well-kept walking/micromobility/public transit infrastructure.

          People don’t suddenly stop driving cars when not-cars becomes the predominant form of transportation. Like I said, “main form of transportation”. That cars are by far the main form is the problem because, among other huge problems, it induces reliance on cars and creates expensive, unmaintainable sprawl that makes other forms of transit completely impractical. Hell, even bumfuck nowhere towns used to have passenger rail that came through them before the tracks were ripped out. I think people who worry that good not-car infrastructure will destroy their ability to drive are projecting, because in reality, it’s always been car infrastructure that eats up everything else around it, not vice-versa.

          “What do you mean ‘boats shouldn’t be the primary form of transportation’? Did you ever consider that I chose to live on an island off the coast of Michigan??”

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Some people are completely unable to understand that not everybody lives in a city with everything on their doorstep, some people have children, and some people need to be able to transport more than a few small items at a time.

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Do those motors keep the rain and snow off you?

          And look at all these single non-parents trying to tell everyone they should only use a bike…

          • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Don’t forget that most of them live in dense urban areas as well, and to say they “look down” on those who don’t would be an absurd understatement.

            Like, I moved to a place that is aiming to be an entirely walkable town, but it’s not there yet. The pandemic put a lot of the development on hold and things are finally getting back up to speed now. My closest grocery store was going to be two blocks away, but that was scrapped. There’s one being built that will be 3 miles away, so bike-able when it’s finally fucking opened. Currently, the closest one(s) are ~10 miles away. I work a job that is entirely possible to do remotely, but the execs have forced us all back into the office, ~20 miles away. I drive a hybrid because I can’t afford a full EV right now. My home’s power is nuclear and solar.

            Some of the chucklefucks in these comment sections act like I’m personally clear cutting the rainforests because I dare to say that I require a car in my current life situation. Motherfuckers, I’m doing all I personally can. So go sabotage some private jets, or locally campaign for more bike lanes and public transit solutions, and get off my balls.

            • Taldan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              they “look down” on those who don’t would be an absurd understatement.

              These discussions are never about rural areas. No one is going to a rural town and installing bike lanes. No one is suggesting 20 miles of bike lanes go in where you live. It’s always about putting in bike lanes and transit where it makes sense

              Some of the chucklefucks in these comment sections act like I’m personally clear cutting the rainforests because I dare to say that I require a car in my current life situation

              People are chastising you for arguing people in cities that could easily bike need to drive a car. That’s what you’re doing. People say we should have bikes and transit in cities and you come out arguing against it

              Keep driving your car. No one is taking it away from you, no matter where you live. We just want the option to bike or take transit in our communities. We don’t currently have that option because suburban and rural people constantly fight urban transit tooth and nail

              • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                These discussions are never about rural areas. No one is going to a rural town and installing[…]

                That’s… not what I’m talking about at all in regards to people talking down about people who live outside of urban centers. There are people out here actively calling people maga chuds based entirely on the environment they live in.

                People are chastising you for arguing people in cities that could easily bike need to drive a car. That’s what you’re doing.

                Oh fuck off, I’ve done no such thing.

                You’re only feeding my point and getting all bent up about shit I didn’t say. Thank you for at least explicitly stating the strawman you’ve imagined me to be.

                suburban and rural people constantly fight urban transit tooth and nail

                Citation fucking needed. How would someone outside one of the cities in question have any influence on those decisions, and more importantly, why in the fuck would they even care?

                I personally have the displeasure of knowing plenty of god awful nimbys, and they’re all upper class urbanites worried that their little nest egg(s) in the wealthy parts of my local city will lose value.