• sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Just a crying shame Mozilla has turned into a commercial nightmare making them relatively poor custodians of the only free choice we have left.

      Mozilla needs to die so Firefox can live.

      The income stream from Firefox is plenty for a highly technical, deeply competent, widely dispersed team could work full time on the product using something like OpenCollective.

      Instead what we get is prime SF real estate offices, “competitive” SF salaries and a commercial organisation that seeks weird and increasingly desperate income streams to justify looking like “real company”.

      I want an actual non-profit governing Firefox.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        It’s called the forks, dude.

        Also, hopefully the ladybug thing or whatever gets off the ground someday.

        Edit: Servo is the better project to follow.

        • vogi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think you mean ladybird, right?
          Just FYI The core maintainer is very close to the alt right open source sphere.
          Rejecting inclusivity as he deems it as too political and just rubbing shoulders with really weird guys.

          https://drewdevault.com/blog/Cloudflare-and-fascists/
          https://kvibber.com/reviews/software/ladybird-inclusivity/

          There is servo though which is picking up speed lately, im following their rss for a while now.
          https://servo.org/
          The money behind is also a lot more public and the project is more open to people. originally developed internally at mozilla it is now in the hands of the linux foundation europe.

          • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Netsurf hasn’t seen any love lately. It’s still being developed on git but no releases. Same with Dillo.

            Dillo rejects scripting. Makes perfect sense to me. It also rejects automatic redirects, which also makes sense but the web has already been established around that as given so it can’t pass the most passive anti-bot.

            The state of scripting support on Netsurf is uhm, quite interesting. Scripts can write to the page parse time (like a snowflake generator) but can’t do ANYTHING after the page loaded, EXCEPT text fields and text areas. And scripts can always read but not write checkbox state. There aren’t any button events, either, but if you check the state of a text field repeatedly you can do interactivity. What is also interesting is that the new way of finding elements (getElementById) is functional, but the old way (document.formName.elementName) ISN’T. So that means that basically nothing existing functions (apart from again, the snowflake generators from geocities). But you can do the old style text animations if you specifically program it to use the new method despite being old style shit. Netsurf also passes “GoAway” and the most basic setting of Anubis (the passive redirects).

            Both are good enough to browse “old Lemmy”, although I haven’t tried to login since my instance doesn’t have it and the owner ghosted me (hi @milan@discuss.tchncs.de).


            There’s also a half public domain half permissive (BSD) text mode browser, https://chawan.net/ . Extraordinarily good concept! However, it avoids some of the bloat by forcing bloat onto your terminal emulator and having it render images, and my terminal emulator does not bother itself with such tasks and emulates a terminal, so image heavy sites like Lemmy fucking suck on it. No, it cannot just weight different characters from some public domain font (spoiler: if converted, all of them by international conventions are public domain) by brightness and by individual pixel similarity to an actual image and then just display those. That would make too much sense. I have high hopes for it, though. Also, I find the keybinds really weird.

            I have not tested Chawan’s scripting support much at all, all I can say is that it’s certainly better than Netsurf. And that everything I’ve written in the worst fucking programming language ever for Netsurf (not released yet, very soon I hope) runs on Chawan. However, they are unusable since textboxes open your preferred editor. Makes perfect sense, a browser shouldn’t be a text editor. But like, that breaks my gimmick that makes it work with Netsurf, damn. Checkboxes can be written to, for once, tho no access key support. The JS is still not enough to login to Lemmy (the default bloated frontend).


            Let’s use Gemini.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          But it isn’t really. The forks rely on the majority effort of Mozilla and they would never be able to maintain Firefox on their own.

          • Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            This this true but if Mozilla closed it doors tomorrow there would be enough support for a team to be built to maintain it. The market share is small compared to chrome but it’s still an enormous user base.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and “uBlock”, if you couln’t guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it’s been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can’t find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

      It’s a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

      At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

      So it’s not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    company which makes most of it’s revenue from advertising fucks with their browser’s ability to remove ads. Go figure!

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        The irony is that Chrome’s rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft’s “embrace, extend, extinguish” tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string.

        But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror.

        Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla’s development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable.

        • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think it’s the shear cost of operating a browser. I would hope Mozilla are looking to diversity there income but without ads or sales to end users I’m not sure where it can go.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think I’ll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot.

    • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      6 days ago

      Most people I know simply don’t care. They will use it because it’s convenient and they don’t care about the privacy dangers. I can’t comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        6 days ago

        They will use it because it’s convenient

        Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I’ve experienced

        • techt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          I think most people who don’t know better just think that’s “the internet” and that it’s the same no matter how you access it. The whole concept of browsers and extensions is just not in the realm of concern.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve seen some shift among the tech illiterate in my immediate vicinity, but most are still in the “I got nothing to hide” category of clueless twits.

        • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 days ago

          Funnily enough my two kids have expressed hatred of AI. It’s mainly people around my age or higher that can’t let any sort of convenience go even if shown the dangers.

          Otherwise I’m just “scaremongering”.

            • Hazor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              My 14yo hates the current AI but says most peers are using it and can’t understand how to write an essay or such without it.

              I think only some of the kids are alright. Many, if not most, are in trouble.

        • OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          The problem is that everyone’s internet experience is very different these days. Your friends might be boring and actually have nothing in their lives that need compartmentalized/obfuscated. It’s unlikely but not impossible.

          The easiest way to demonstrate the problem would be when they show you something on an unprotected device you note the ads and give them shit for it. Those ads are likely targeted, and so your jabs would be targeted and personal too. Then point out that those ads are tied to THEM. Just ask every time, “have you been looking at X? Gross dude.” It doesn’t matter what it is. It’s the point that they are uncomfortable with your guess and it’s an opening to explain that, yeah it’s not just those ads buddy.

  • danielfm123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Install Firefox with https://adnauseam.io/, it’s basically ublock origin but internally clicks on every add destroying your adds profile and damaging economics of adds and conversion.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Well, it anonymizes you by “faking” the tracking. I would hope it takes steps to sandbox the ads.

        • Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          What does it fake about the tracking? The tracking is very real and the tool is clicking every tracking link available on the site like its life depends on it

      • dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Step 2: install Privacy Badger

        And Facebook Container is another useful one.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          Don’t, privacy badge and adnauseam will interfere eachothers and as result you will get worst results, you are better off using a DNS level adblocker (eg: Pihole or NextDNS if you don’t/can’t self host) alongside uBlock/adnauseam

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            They overlap; Ublock does it through lists, and badger does it through heuristics.

            Running just badger, it can miss things, if you can use both, you get all the lists and heuristics, but they’re probalby not both necessary

            • mschae@discuss.mschae23.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s best not to use multiple ad blockers at the same time. They’ll conflict with each other and you’ll be worse off. uBO alone is probably enough.

                • Taldan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  I’ve used them both for years and never noticed any sort of conflict, but I’ve heard that potential conflict mentioned several times with no clarification

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 days ago

    When will people switch away from Chrome to other browsers? I get it, Chrome sets the standards and it’s hard to switch away from them, but it’s necessary to ensure the survival of the Internet.

  • 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    Damn it.

    Gotta use chrome at work.

    Firefox “isn’t secure and isn’t supported” - my it director

  • DeadPixel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sing it with me:

    Chrome, huh, yeah.
    What is it good for?
    Absolutely nothing, uhh….

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      Brave is kinda shady with their whole cryptocurrency thing, Helium seems fine but it’s still based on Chromium. I’ve been recommending people check out Librewolf

      • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 days ago

        Simple Firefox is perfectly fine.

        Ungoogled Chromium is my standby for the instances when a Blink browser is needed, though it’s not entirely simple to set up.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Librewolf doesn’t do anything that Firefox can’t do with extensions + tweaking settings, but it’s nice to not have to install all the extensions

        • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah that’s why I’m debating brave. Firefox is good to especially after the huge engine overhaul a few years ago.

      • Tiral@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, I’ve been on brave for a few years but switched to Firefox because it’s a different base. I don’t think it’s necessary better, but if that’s the way the wind is blowing on chromium browsers the it’s the best option.

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        Or better yet LibreWolf

        I cannot count how many things I had to change in settings to get the browser to just work right, I mean I appreciate them locking everything down to the nth degree but… damn. Finally switched to waterfox, the out of the box experience is a lot friendlier.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I tried LibreWolf for a little while, but too many sites just wouldn’t load at all with it, so I went back to Firefox.

        • SquareScarletCougar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I get the frustration. It could have a tutorial / wizard to make it easier to set and understand.

          If some parts are not loading, check the top left of the address bar for some icons, by default LibreWolf blocks canvas and anything that can identify you, and you have to press on them to allow them to render the elements.

          Security unfortunately implies more inconvenience, which is what companies like Google love, but if it was a lot friendlier it would probably be less safe.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I’m using Zen now. it took me a while while to get the hang of the UI. But once I did I found it to be very nice to have those spaces that I can organize for different tasks.

        • iamnotme@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’ve used Zen for about 9 months, possibly more, and have had a largely positive experience.

          It has crashed a few times recently for no obvious reason but not enough to bother me. There’s probably new release version again even though I updated my Linux instance a couple of weeks ago.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      First time hearing of Helium, thanks for mentioning. Sounds interesting, will be keeping an eye on it.