• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Especially since it very obviously does not physically turn into flesh and blood. Any priest with half an eye would see that. It’s reconciling it with what transubstantiation is supposed to do in doctrine that’s the hard part.

    • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well the doctrine specifies the whole no outward characteristics changing part so it’s just a contradiction, but faith and logic are mutually exclusive.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t understand why anybody does communion or baptism or any of it. I mean, I do because it’s all bonding and stuff, but if you look at the religion on paper, all you need to do is accept Jesus and you’re saved. You don’t even have to go to church!

        • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I forgot that different denominations have diffident requirements. I always thought it was pretty sketchy having the barrier to entry be that low.

          • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Yeah I think that’s one of the evangelical branches that play that shit which frankly explains a lot. Ironically most christian denominations think catholics are heretics and idolators, again due to totally reasonable misunderstandings about Mary, the saints, and the whole trinity shenanigan, even though catholics are like the OG J-dude acolytes. It’s all pretty interesting in an academic sense but jobs of horrifying these beliefs are dictating government policy.